
![]() |
|||||||||||||
WJPR Citation
|
| All | Since 2020 | |
| Citation | 8502 | 4519 |
| h-index | 30 | 23 |
| i10-index | 227 | 96 |
A CASE REPORT ON MATERIOVIGILANCE OF HEARING AIDS
Sarika L. Vikhe, Rajashri Ghogare*, Saiprasad V. Wani, Kaushal A. Thorat and Chetan G. Tathe
. Abstract This article is centered on the significance of materiovigilance in hearing aids, which involves monitoring and reporting adverse events linked to medical devices. The piece highlights the potential risks that are associated with hearing aids, including irritation, infection, and allergic reactions, and emphasizes the importance of effective materiovigilance in ensuring patient safety. The review comprises an extensive evaluation of current materiovigilance systems for hearing aids, including the regulatory framework and reporting mechanisms. It also discusses the difficulties and restrictions of materiovigilance, such as the lack of standardization and underreporting. Additionally, the article presents a case study of a patient who experienced severe irritation and inflammation due to a hearing aid device. This case study underscores the urgency of timely identification and reporting of adverse events to prevent further harm to patients. Overall, this review emphasizes the essential role of materiovigilance in guaranteeing the safety and efficacy of hearing aids. It advocates for increased awareness and collaboration among healthcare providers, manufacturers, and regulatory authorities to strengthen materiovigilance systems and enhance patient. Keywords: Materiovigilance, Hearing aid, Medical devices, Case study. [Full Text Article] [Download Certificate] |
