Abstract

A REVIEW ARTICLE ON COMPARING AND ANALYSE THE MINUTENESS OF REPORTORIAL RUBRIC SELECTION BY STUDYING THE SMALL RUBRICS UPTO 5 DRUGS AND SINGLE REMEDY RUBRIC FROM KENT’S REPERTORY AND BOGER BOENNINGHAUSEN’S CHARACTERISTICS AND REPERTORY

Dr. Ankita Anil Shete and Dr. Anita S. Patil*

.

Abstract

In our daily work, we discovered a number of distinctive mental and bodily symptoms. Remedy rubrics, which can be either small or single, serve as beneficial aids in improving the precision and effectiveness of homeopathic prescribing. If the patient shows any peculiar or rare symptoms, it is crucial for our prescription. Single remedy rubrics are helpful, stemming from their ability to streamline the prescribing process, save time and improve patient confidence in remedy selection. Single remedy rubrics in the repertorization process is essential for their precision, differentiation, individualization, efficiency, and reliance on clinical experience. Considering this fact, the role of a single remedy rubric becomes very important in the process of repertorization as well as to select a final remedy which will help the patient. Single-medicine rubrics are very useful for accurate prescription since they identify particular symptoms in a repertory that correlate to only one remedy. When a distinct solution corresponds with a well-defined illness, these rubrics are essential for removing confusion from multiple choice questions. Methods: Following the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and we conducted a literature search in web databases Pubmed, Research gate, Google scholar, and Scopus for publications.

Keywords: Rubrics, Repertory, Keynote, Remedy.