
![]() |
|||||||||||||
WJPR Citation
|
| All | Since 2020 | |
| Citation | 8502 | 4519 |
| h-index | 30 | 23 |
| i10-index | 227 | 96 |
A SUMMARY OF THE ROLE PLAYED BY PRAMANAS IN AYURVEDIC RESEARCH METHODS
*Divyanshi Verma, Pankaj Singh, Anshul Sharma, Ravi Pratap Singh, Saloni Vishnoi, Sushma
. Abstract Ayurveda is recognized as a scientific discipline that relies upon four Pramāṇas: Aptopadesa, Pratyakṣa, Anumana, and Yukti. Among these, Aptopadesa serves as the primary source of knowledge acquisition; Pratyakṣa represents direct perception; Anumana provides inferential understanding; and Yukti emphasizes rational and logical interpretation. These Pramaṇas collectively hold a vital position in Ayurvedic research methodology, as they guide the entire research process—ranging from the selection of a problem and formulation of a hypothesis to data collection, analysis, interpretation, and dissemination of results. With the increasing exploration of Ayurvedic specialties, researchers are required to maintain equilibrium between classical principles and modern scientific tools. Within this framework, Siddhanta, described under the forty-four Vadamargas, is considered a significant instrument for theory formulation. It is categorized into four types: Abhyupagama Siddhanta, Sarva Tantra Siddhanta, Pratitantra Siddhanta, and Adhikaran Siddhanta. For any research undertaking, systematic planning and preparation are indispensable. Research itself may be defined as the pursuit of new knowledge, while research methodology represents the structured approach employed to identify, process, and analyse a given problem. In Ayurveda, valid knowledge is referred to as Parma, and the means by which it is acquired are termed Pramaṇa, both of which constitute the foundation of Ayurvedic research methodology. Keywords: Pramana, Pararthanumana, Research Methodology, Aptopdesha, Pratyaksha, Anumana, Yukti. [Full Text Article] [Download Certificate] |
